Supreme court is consisted of eight justices and they all come from the federal appeals courts. Justice Antonin Scalia, who died on the Saturday, also came from the federal appeal court. All eight justices graduated from Harvard or Yale and didn’t have an elective office. By the opinion of many experts, the supreme court has become more insulated institution than ever.
This matter implies next questions regarding next justice who is to come, should we expect something different, new refreshment and professional expertise that is not present at the moment on the court? Will the new nominee bring new excitement?
If new justice nominee is required to have the same credentials such as those that are serving at the moment, then our choice has become extremely narrow. Benjamin Barton, a law professor at the University of Tennessee states that most of Americans are worried about elite running the state and by their opinion not doing a good job, but when we question ourselves, this is the most elite group that we have. But, the things didn’t use to be like this.
In 1987 Democratic senate rejected nominee of President Ronald Regan, Robert H. Bork, because of his far right views. President has always played safe regarding this matter and chose the nominees who had a look of naïve federal judge.
The former governor of California, Earl Warren, was the politician who left the largest impact on Supreme Court. He was nominated by the President Dwight D. Eisenhower, because Warren helped him in gaining a presidential nomination in 1952. This all case may seem scandalous, but he was one of the greatest supreme court justices, and the country had numerous benefits of his leadership. For more info navigate to this web-site it was one of the greatest justices America has seen.
It is yet to be seen who will inherit justice Antonin Scalia’s seat at the Supreme Court. Read More
Conviction of this police officer in the shooting death of Akai Gurley has raised a lot of questions regarding criminal justice system in New York. In most cases, officers who are accused of killing unarmed civilian are not criminally charged, of if they are, judges in non-jury trials release them. But, why is this case so different?
The jurors, while conducting investigation, had an opportunity to put themselves in Liang’s position, when they were allowed to pull the trigger. They concluded that quick flinch, when a person is surprised, wasn’t enough to fire a weapon. That had to be a conscious decision, even if there wasn’t an intention to strike a person. This an important part, because the jury made a decision and convicted him of reckless manslaughter. The law doesn’t recognize an intention of a person to harm another person, but the act that has been done. Jurors state that Peter’s finger shouldn’t have been on the trigger.
Other police officers were, we could say, in similar situations, but they have been asked to present their testimony to the court and to the jury, they had an excuse, such as: you don’t know what I saw, or you don’t know the danger I faced. But, Peter Liang only saw darkness.
Few moments after a deadly shoot, Liang tried to cover up his tracks, he searched for the missing bullet and failed to notify ambulance and police. In his search for a bullet, he stumbled upon on a dying Gurley. His friend Melissa tried to give him CPR, but Liang didn’t do anything to help unfortunate man.
His partner later testified that Liang was more worried about how to conceal his weapon then to help a dying man. Here states that is often worse to conceal the evidence then to admit you are guilty. Read More
In Thursday, NYPD office’s Peter Liang was convicted for the reckless manslaughter of Akai Gurley. This may be a surprised verdict, but brings powerful message regarding police killings and shows the public that they aren’t above the law.
The Brooklyn courtroom was packed with people and filled with tension just before 7 p.m. when the jury came with a verdict. The deceased family sat for two weeks in the front row. The mother of Gurley’s daughter stated that she was thankful to God and to DA who promised them a conviction.
When jury issued their decision, the look on Peter Liang face could not be described, from surprise to disbelief. He buried his head in his hands, while his defender put his hand on his back. Several people in the courtroom gasped from surprise.
He will remain free on bail until April 14, when he is facing up to 15 years of prison. This is the first case in a decade, for one police officer of NYPD to be convicted.
Kenneth Thomson, Brooklyn District Attorney stated that he had dealt with only one case of police killing and that is the case of Peter Liang. He also said that they support their police officers, but when an innocent man is shot and killed, the ones who are responsible will have to pay for their crimes.
On a day he was killed, Gurley had to take stairs because the elevator wasn’t working in the Pink Houses. The deceased father has a two-year-old girl and he was walking with his friend Melissa down the stairs. One floor above officer Liang and his partner were checking out the building due to the high rate of criminal in this part of the town.
When Liang took a stand, he testified that he didn’t have a finger on the trigger and that his finger was on the side of the gun. He stated that something has startled him on his left side and that gun went off.
click on this link to know about the troubling experience for young girl, because she will be growing up without father. Read More